Property Update
The Auckland Racing Club is currently going through the process of applying to rezone some of its land which is now surplus to racing requirements. This is known as Private Plan Change 168 and was publicly notified on June 7th, 2009.
- To read the two questions raised from Public Meeting, please click here.
- To read the official press release please click here
- To read the Auckland Racing Club Members' update please click here.
Below are images of the area of land referred to in the Private Plan Change 168. Please note that the 2400m chute will NOT be affected at all by any proposed development of this land. The Club have also ensured that a full line of site exists from all areas of the Ellerslie Stand and any proposed development will not effect views of the racecourse.
Area as part of overall Racecourse (refer Plan Change 168)
Proposed roading (white) and development areas (grey)

Concept Diagram (no building will be forward of sightline or across 2400m chute)


Two questions raised from the Public Meeting
Stone walls
The question related to the Club’s intentions to rebuild the existing stone wall on the new boundary adjacent to the proposed new roundabout.
The position is as follows:
There are three areas in which portions of existing stone walls will be removed:
-
A small opening on Morrin Street opposite Kentucky Street.
-
A short length near the existing entry of Morrin Street close to the Montessori School.
-
A larger section to allow for the new road and roundabout.
The Club’s heritage report concludes that the removal of these sections of stone wall is acceptable and the Plan Change itself contains controls on the removal of the stone walls:
- The Club must make an application for a resource consent to remove any part of the stone walls.
- The Plan Change provides criteria against which the Council must consider the application.
- One of those criteria is whether the stones to be removed are to be reused to form ‘wall returns or gateways’ in the vicinity. Another is that, in the case of walls to be removed in the vicinity of the Mitchelson Street/Morrin Street intersection, adequate sight lines for traffic are maintained.
Rebuilding the wall is a possible outcome but whether or not it proves feasible or desirable will depend on the factors outlined above amongst other.
Maximum heights/storeys of buildings
The question was why, if a 3 metre floor to floor height is assumed, there will be an extra 2 metres of height for each building.
The reason for this is to encourage good urban and architectural design and enable the relevant design controls and criteria in the plan change to be achieved.
The extra 2 metres allows a designer flexibility to accommodate the following:
- The lowest floor level may be above the natural ground level by, say, 0.5 of a metre.
- The lowest floor or first floor may have a greater floor to floor height.
- Variation in the height of roof top designs, including gables, parapets etc.
The extra 2 metres covers these possibilities but is insufficient to allow the creation of an extra floor.